Sourcetree Gitkraken

Back to list

Sourcetree Vs Gitkraken Vs Tower
Sourcetree Gitkraken

Two of the Git GUIs developers choose most often include Axosoft's GitKraken and Atlassian's Sourcetree; both tools are open source and available with free versions. Sourcetree is a simple, powerful Git GUI. Atlassian has enhanced the tool - though some users say sparingly - since its introduction in 2013. Should I use GitKraken or SourceTree for Git? This handy flowchart asks the important, probing questions that get to the bottom of who you really are, and whether you should be using GitKraken, GitKraken Pro, or SourceTree for your Git workflow. GitKraken and SourceTree can be categorized as 'Source Code Management Desktop Apps' tools. 'Dark theme' is the primary reason why developers consider GitKraken over the competitors, whereas 'Visual history and branch view' was stated as the key factor in picking SourceTree. GitKraken would like you to sign into an established 'git' server - in this case either GitHub or their own GitKraken server account. You may need to do this later, but we're going to skip this step for now - close this dialog box by clicking the 'X' in the top-right corner (where the arrows are pointing to).

The Internet is full of articles on why you shouldn’t use Git submodules. While submodules are useful for a few use cases, they do have several drawbacks.

Are there alternatives? The answer is: yes! There are (at least) two tools that can help track the history of software dependencies in your project while allowing you to keep using Git:

git subtree
Google repo

In this post we will look at git subtree Hdmi video capture card for mac. and show why it is an improvement – albeit not perfect – over git submodule.

What is `git subtree`, and why should I use it?

git subtree lets you nest one repository inside another as a sub-directory. It is one of several ways Git projects can manage project dependencies.

Why you may want to consider git subtree

Management of a simple workflow is easy.
Older version of Git are supported (even older than v1.5.2).
The sub-project’s code is available right after the clone of the super project is done.
git subtree does not require users of your repository to learn anything new. They can ignore the fact that you are using git subtree to manage dependencies.
git subtree does not add new metadata files like git submodule does (i.e., .gitmodule).
Contents of the module can be modified without having a separate repository copy of the dependency somewhere else.

Drawbacks (but in our opinion they're largely acceptable):

You must learn about a new merge strategy (i.e.git subtree).
Contributing code back upstream for the sub-projects is slightly more complicated.
The responsibility of not mixing super and sub-project code in commits lies with you.

How to use `git subtree`

git subtree is available in stock version of Git since May 2012 – v1.7.11 and above. The version installed by homebrew on OSX already has subtree properly wired, but on some platforms you might need to follow the installation instructions.

Here is a canonical example of tracking a vim plug-in using git subtree.

The quick and dirty way without remote tracking

If you just want a couple of one-liners to cut and paste, read this paragraph. First add git subtree at a specified prefix folder:

(The common practice is to not store the entire history of the subproject in your main repository, but If you want to preserve it just omit the –squash flag.)

The above command produces this output:

As you can see this records a merge commit by squashing the whole history of the vim-surround repository into a single one:

If after a while you want to update the code of the plugin from the upstream repository you can just do a git subtree pull:

This is very quick and painless, but the commands are slightly lengthy and hard to remember. We can make the commands shorter by adding the sub-project as a remote.

Adding the sub-project as a remote

Adding the subtree as a remote allows us to refer to it in shorter form:

Now we can add the subtree (as before), but now we can refer to the remote in short form:

The command to update the sub-project at a later date becomes:

Contributing back upstream

We can freely commit our fixes to the sub-project in our local working directory now. When it’s time to contribute back to the upstream project, we need to fork the project and add it as another remote:

Release date Sunday, January 17 2021. Download Create a Server. Bukkit server.

Now we can use the subtree push command like the following:

After this we’re ready and we can open a pull-request to the maintainer of the package.

Can I do this without using the `git subtree` command?

Yes! Yes you can. git subtree is different from the subtree merge strategy. You can still use the merge strategy even if for some reason git subtree is not available. Here is how you would go about it.

Add the dependency as a simple git remote: Evernote usa.

Before reading the contents of the dependency into the repository, it’s important to record a merge so that we can track the entire tree history of the plug-in up to this point:

Which outputs:

We then read the content of the latest tree-object into the plugin repository into our working directory ready to be committed:

Now we can commit (and it will be a merge commit that will preserve the history of the tree we read):

When we want to update the project we can now pull using the git subtree merge strategy:

Sourcetree Vs Gitkraken Vs Tower

`Git subtree` is a great alternative

After having used git submodules for a while, you'll see git subtree solves lots of the problems with git submodule. As usual, with all things Git, there is a learning curve to make the most of the feature.

Follow me on Twitter @durdn for more things and stuff about Git. And check out Atlassian Bitbucket if you’re looking for a good tool to manage your Git repos.